Alaska, United States
Server infrastructure for AgTech in Alaska
Infrastructure for AgTech is a question of matching the machine to the application, then putting it near the people using it. For a medium AgTech business in Alaska that is about 4 Cores, 64 GB of memory and 3000 GB of storage on VDS.
- ✓ 5 infrastructure tiers
- ✓ Sized for your workload, not a plan name
- ✓ Same price in all 24 locations
Estimated from fibre distance, not measured from Alaska. Your real figure depends on your connection and route, and lands inside this range.
Choose the infrastructure for your workload
Three sizes of business, each sized from an assumed traffic figure rather than a measured one. If you know your own numbers, tell us and the estimate changes with them.
Small AgTech
1–10 people · ~5,000 visits a month
$336.55 USD USD
per month · VDS
- 2 Cores
- 24 GB RAM
- 800 GB storage
About 1.4 requests a second at peak, holding roughly 16.8 GB of working data.
Configure this build →Medium AgTech Most likely here
11–50 people · ~50,000 visits a month
$911.65 USD USD
per month · VDS
- 4 Cores
- 64 GB RAM
- 3000 GB storage
- Managed
About 13.9 requests a second at peak, holding roughly 48 GB of working data.
Configure this build →Large AgTech
51+ people · ~500,000 visits a month
$2,639.65 USD USD
per month · Dedicated Server
- 20 Cores
- 256 GB RAM
- 4000 GB storage
- Managed
About 138.9 requests a second at peak, holding roughly 192 GB of working data.
Configure this build →These figures are assumptions stated out loud, not predictions about your business. Memory, cores and disk can all be raised on the same server later, usually within the hour, with no rebuild and no new IP address — so starting one size below the estimate is normally the cheaper mistake.
Why AgTech size up this way
Working from about 50,000 visits a month and roughly 400,000 requests a day, storage grows by roughly 160 GB a month at this size, which usually decides the build before CPU does; about 48 GB of data needs to stay in memory to keep queries fast; and each request costs real computation rather than a cache lookup, so cores matter more here than on a typical site.
- 13.9 req/sec at peak
- 48 GB working set
- 160 GB/month growth
- Linux
Which tiers suit AgTech
Including the ones that do not, and why — that is usually the more useful half.
| Infrastructure | Verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Shared Hosting Managed space on a shared server | Not this one | Shared hosting cannot run background workers, queues or long-lived processes, which a SaaS application depends on. |
| VPS Flexible virtual infrastructure with full root access | Recommended | The natural home for an early-stage product: root access, your own runtime, and the ability to resize as you grow. |
| VDS Virtual server with resources pinned to you alone | Recommended | Pinned resources give you the predictable latency your customers will hold you to in an SLA. |
| Dedicated Server An entire physical server, configured to your specification | Recommended | Right once the database and the application tier are competing for the same memory on a single virtual instance. |
| Bare Metal Physical compute for sustained, demanding workloads | Workable | For platforms running their own virtualization, or holding a large working set entirely in memory. |
AgTech workloads you can host
Imagery analysis over whole holdings is heavy compute against data that arrives on a satellite's schedule.
- Sensor ingestion
- Satellite & imagery analysis
- Prescription mapping
- Farm dashboards
- Machinery integrations
Where your server runs
All 24 locations cost the same, so pick whichever sits closest to the people who will actually use the server.
Alaska is closest to Seattle. Every marker costs the same per month.
Show all 24 locations and distances from Alaska ▾
| Location | Distance | Est. round trip |
|---|---|---|
| Americas · 9 locations | ||
| Seattle, United States | 1,355 miles | 33–65 ms |
| Santa Clara, United States | 1,989 miles | 48–96 ms |
| Los Angeles, United States | 2,281 miles | 55–110 ms |
| Chicago, United States | 2,717 miles | 66–131 ms |
| Toronto, Canada | 2,889 miles | 70–139 ms |
| Dallas, United States | 2,942 miles | 71–142 ms |
| New York, United States | 3,220 miles | 78–155 ms |
| Atlanta, United States | 3,274 miles | 79–158 ms |
| Miami, United States | 3,875 miles | 94–187 ms |
| Asia-Pacific · 7 locations | ||
| Tokyo, Japan | 3,587 miles | 87–173 ms |
| Hong Kong, China | 5,175 miles | 125–250 ms |
| Delhi NCR, India | 5,732 miles | 138–277 ms |
| Kolkata, India | 5,876 miles | 142–284 ms |
| Mumbai, India | 6,442 miles | 155–311 ms |
| Singapore | 6,782 miles | 164–327 ms |
| Sydney, Australia | 7,491 miles | 181–362 ms |
| Europe, Middle East & Africa · 8 locations | ||
| Stockholm, Sweden | 4,004 miles | 97–193 ms |
| London, United Kingdom | 4,366 miles | 105–211 ms |
| Amsterdam, The Netherlands | 4,368 miles | 105–211 ms |
| Frankfurt, Germany | 4,558 miles | 110–220 ms |
| Milan, Italy | 4,877 miles | 118–235 ms |
| Madrid, Spain | 5,047 miles | 122–244 ms |
| Bucharest, Romania | 5,063 miles | 122–244 ms |
| Tel Aviv, Israel | 5,929 miles | 143–286 ms |
Distances are from Alaska. Round trips are estimated from fibre distance, not measured — the figure your users see depends on where they are.
AgTech in Alaska
Agriculture & Livestock is one of the sectors Alaska is known for, so this is a workload we are asked about here more than most.
The closest of our 24 data centres to Alaska is Seattle, about 1,355 miles away. Choosing the closest data centre is the cheapest performance improvement available, and it costs nothing extra.
Data stays in the jurisdiction you choose, which matters if you are working to state privacy laws such as the CCPA. Pricing is quoted in USD, and the figure is the same wherever the machine physically sits.
Network reach from Alaska
Estimated from fibre distance rather than measured, and stated as a range. Your own access network decides the rest.
| Data centre | Distance from Alaska | Estimated round trip |
|---|---|---|
| Seattleamericas | 1,355 miles | 33–65 ms |
| Santa Claraamericas | 1,989 miles | 48–96 ms |
| Los Angelesamericas | 2,281 miles | 55–110 ms |
every one of our 24 locations costs the same — so the only thing worth optimising is which of them your users are closest to. At the medium size assumed above, that is roughly 400,000 requests a day crossing that link.
AgTech hosting in Alaska — FAQs
What size server does a AgTech business in Alaska need?
Where would the server for my Alaska business actually run?
Is a VPS enough for AgTech, or do we need a dedicated server?
Can you host sensor ingestion for us?
Can we start smaller and grow?
Other industries in Alaska
Same city, different workload.
AgTech hosting nearby
The same workload, in the nearest cities.